> Tomer seems to have created or had created a drill logo for the bay area > users' group. See > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Drill-User-Group/in the upper > left. > > What is the sense of the group about whether this or something like it > should be our logo? I don't really want to have a month-long discussion of > a logo, but we should have one eventually and deciding early is probably > easier than later. > > Associated with that, is there a bright spark who feels that they could do > lots better? If so, have at it and let's discuss the options.
Good enough for now, hence +1 … I've adopted it at: * G+ page https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/106081196028708015488/ * http://drill-user.org/ Note: Tomer, when you get around, please provide us with a high-res version via the repo - this one I'm currently using is really utterly shitty, resolution-wise ;) Cheers, Michael -- Michael Hausenblas Ireland, Europe http://mhausenblas.info/ On 15 Oct 2012, at 23:36, Ted Dunning wrote: > Three questions here, none of which have to do with technical substance. > > ----- Branding ----- > > Tomer seems to have created or had created a drill logo for the bay area > users' group. See > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Drill-User-Group/in the upper > left. > > What is the sense of the group about whether this or something like it > should be our logo? I don't really want to have a month-long discussion of > a logo, but we should have one eventually and deciding early is probably > easier than later. > > Associated with that, is there a bright spark who feels that they could do > lots better? If so, have at it and let's discuss the options. > > > ----- Technical ----- > > I have been saying "logical plan" for the (hopefully) universal > representation that comes out of the parser plus some semantic steps. > Jason and Julian have indicated that a more standard term would be > "physical plan". I am happy to switch the plan doc to standard > nomenclature. > > What say ye all? > > Along similar lines, it appears that database articles have DAG's that flow > upwards. I have been drawing them downwards simply because that is the > default in Omnigraffle. I can invert and draw them going upwards if it is > the consensus that it matters/is preferable. > > What say ye to this?
