+1. We should implement in the base parent and then just inherit down. J
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Andrew Psaltis <[email protected] > wrote: > +1 > > In good health, > Andrew > > Sent from my GPU powered iPhone > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 19:13, "Keys Botzum" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > ________________________________ > > Keys Botzum > > Senior Principal Technologist > > WW Systems Engineering > > [email protected] > > 443-718-0098 > > MapR Technologies > > http://www.mapr.com > > > > > > > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 9:08 PM, Timothy Chen wrote: > > > >> I don't really know what's different between 4.8 and 3.8, but I > definitely > >> won't mind. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Tim > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> The code that has been checked in so far uses junit 3.8.1. > >>> > >>> I have been using junit 4.8.2 in another project and am enamored of > some of > >>> the capabilities. > >>> > >>> Anybody mind if I move everything to that version? > > >
