Dear Lisen,
HBase and Hadoop works well in JDK7u11. I know few that are in production. http://sreevaddi.blogspot.com/2012/05/hadoop-200-alpha-standalone-and-jdk7u4.html hadoop eco systems compiled in 6 running in 7. I compiled in 7u4 and run in 7u4, too. Will post a link, later. Also, drill works well on my local 7u15. Thanking you. With Regards Sree ________________________________ From: Lisen Mu <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:21 AM Subject: Re: about JDK versions Thanks Philip! I have no concern about jdk 7 indeed. Just hopes HBase and Hadoop guys could get this done sooner, for example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5261 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Philip Haynes < [email protected]> wrote: > Can't speak to the broader group but I would point out that JDK 6 > is EOL. Furthermore I have been testing the G1GC with RAM footprints up to > 400 GB > And it is been performing very well. Apart from not actually having done > tests, > I have no reason to suspect scaling up to 1GB won't be possible. > > I would suggest JDK 1.7 is fine and not to back port. > > https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/java_6_eol_h_h > > > On 11/03/13 8:48 PM, "Lisen Mu" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hello. > > > >I've noticed that current version of drill compiles successfully under jdk > >7, but not under jdk 6. > > > >However, It seems that the hadoop community has not yet announced official > >"support" for jdk 7: > > > >http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions > > > >So before diving into further development, It would be very helpful to > >know > >your opinion and plan about supporting different jdk versions. Will there > >be a back port to jdk 6? > > > >many thanks! > > >
