Yes, I'd like to do that too. There, "_map" is acting a bit like Java's "this".

On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Also to add syntactic sugar such as "_map.field" as shorthand for
>> "_map['field']".
>> 
> 
> What about table.field as table._map['field'] ?

Reply via email to