I didn't realize that. Why do you have that dependency? On Jul 27, 2013 5:04 AM, "Srihari Srinivasan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I understand correctly what you are suggesting is we add the snippet > below in the http-engine's pom file. Since I already have java-exec depend > on http-engine won't this make it a case of having cyclic dependencies that > mvn will complain about? > > Hari > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Let's get an alpha out before we break out the client. > > > > In the meantime, I downloaded your stuff and it seemed to work fine > > when it depends on java-exec. > > > > I'd suggest you use the dependency like this to avoid any weird > conflicts: > > > > <dependency> > > <groupId>org.apache.drill.exec</groupId> > > <artifactId>java-exec</artifactId> > > <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > > <exclusions> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>jsp-api-2.1</artifactId> > > <groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>jetty</artifactId> > > <groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > </exclusions> > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Srihari Srinivasan > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Any thoughts on the DrillClient modularization/short term alternative? > > > > > > Hari > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: Srihari Srinivasan <[email protected]> > > > Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:33 PM > > > Subject: Re: Meeting today > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Quick note on what we discussed w.r.t the REST API. > > > > > > I am at a point where to submit a query (logical for now) to the > > Drillbit I > > > need an instance of the DrillClient class from the Query REST resource. > > > DrillClient is currently part of the java-exec module. I've pulled out > > the > > > jersey/jetty stuff into its own mvn module to keep the concerns > separate. > > > > > > So the really question is - Is now a good time to pull out DrillClient > > and > > > its dependencies into its own client module? That way http-engine can > > just > > > depend on the client lib. Having this will be a huge help as it can > > > potentially keep a parallel stream of working going. > > > > > > Any other ideas/suggestions? > > > > > > Jason - This is the link to my github > > > branch<https://github.com/srihari/incubator-drill>. > > > Its still a clone of the execwork branch. > > > > > > -- Hari > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Sounds good to me. > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Srihari Srinivasan > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > HI Folks, > > >> > > > >> > Moving on I am trying to implement the functionality that creates a > > query > > >> > via the REST interface. I have a question w.r.t its implementation. > > One > > >> way > > >> > to implement this would be via the DrillClient class by calling its > > >> > runQuery(QueryType) method as illustrated in > > TestDistributedFragmentRun. > > >> > > > >> > Does this approach make sense? Should we be considering any other > > >> > alternatives? > > >> > > > >> > Hari > > >> > > >
