Downloaded and built the latest tarball, mvn tests passed as well. +1
Tim On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Lisen Mu <[email protected]> wrote: > Bravo! > > by the way, nice logo! > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote: > > > IMHO, I would prefer to focus on following > > > > 1. Fix Header, RAT should run clean > > 2. Fix License, it's painful, but get it's best to get it right first > time > > 3. Source only release, which builds fine and test passes fine > > > > This would be good to get the release all the +1's needed. > > > > I will hunt down the Licensing related discussion that we had, to see if > I > > can help here. Alternatively, reaching out to incubator general always > help > > (sebb is very helpful in fixing this aspect ). I shall try to spend time > on > > this in next few hours. > > > > Hopefully, we shall have a release soon :) > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Regarding libs, I concur. The source release does not have jars. I > > think > > > I may have confused myself by unpacking both into the same place and > not > > > properly cleaning in between. > > > > > > Regarding licenses and headers, I don't know the full list. Clearly we > > > need license info about netty since we include that code. Clearly a > fair > > > bit of code doesn't have any headers. Removing the sandbox from the > > source > > > release might be a strong step toward fixing that in the actual > release. > > > > > > I suspect that because we keep finding lint that this isn't a complete > > list > > > of problems. I think that generating a better list of problems by > having > > a > > > small group meet and walk through the (large and confusing) Apache > > release > > > guide would be helpful. > > > > > > I have asked Grant and Isabel to take a peek and help us get a more > > > complete view of what is needed as well. I may ask somebody else from > > the > > > incubator crew to give us a hand, especially if Grant and Isabel are > tied > > > up. > > > > > > A big part of the problem has to do with the fact that Apache release > > > processes are a bit variable. Another part is that the standards are > > > changing. Another is that there are *lots* of details to be covered. > > > > > > Once this first release is done, a second release should be massively > > > easier. Frankly, the difficulty of the first release is precisely the > > > point of the incubator and the mentor system. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Libs: > > > > The source release doesn't have any jars in it as far as I can > tell... > > > > > > > > License Headers/Netty: > > > > Are you saying we need to fix license headers and add a notice for > > Netty > > > > then do another rc? If so, is there anything else we need to do > > before I > > > > do the work of another release? > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Ted Dunning < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Do we have the list of licenses? Or has someone run RAT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just ran RAT. > > > > > > > > > > We have lots of files with no license headers. > > > > > > > > > > We also have code with Netty headers which isn't mentioned in the > > > NOTICES > > > > > or LICENSES file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > thanks > > ashish > > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal > > >
