Don't think it is critical enough to sink another RC but here it is DRILL-228 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-228>
Regards, Aditya... -- Aditya... On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Downloaded the tar ball. > > Check signature. Check md5. Check sha1. > > Compiles and packages. Check. > > Rat seems happy. Exclusions seem reasonable. Check. > > Read all the upper-case files. The only (slightly) strange one is > DEPENDENCIES which seems to have fewer items than the LICENSE file. All > seem fine. I noted the disclaimer in the README. > > Inspected the web site. Noted the shiny new disclaimer. > > I tried a trivial query. It works. > > I am too tired to do more. > > +1. Ship it! > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > My eyes are a bit bleary with poms, licenses and excludes. Hopefully, > this > > is the milestone 1 candidate to rule them all. > > > > Please download, take for a spin, and let me know +/-1 > > > > There are a lot packaging changes here. Theoretically no code changes > > other than fixing license headers. Hopefully, we didn't exclude anything > > that should have been included. Sandbox is excluded in this source > release > > and we're no longer including the binary release. > > > > New candidate has fixes for DRILL-221 through DRILL-226. Also includes > > automatic running of RAT and a bunch of updates to make the source > tarball > > cleaner (we had to fork from the upstream pom's assembly to get things > > right). > > > > Check it out here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4/ > > > > Vote open for 3 days, closes 11pm Friday pacific. > > > > I've held off pushing the git changes to master for the release version > pom > > rolls until it gets approved. (We already have too many mvn versions > > comments in the commit log.) > > > > Thanks for all your help! > > > > Jacques > > >
