Some sort of programmatic generation of physical plans would be useful although it is not clear how much effort it would save ... that would depend on how the interface is implemented.
Aman On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Jason Altekruse <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello Drillers, > > I was working on rebasing my work for logical plan -> optiq conversion and > found an issue with some tests for the parquet reader. The tests that were > in error were not making the build failed because I had marked them ignore, > as they depended on binary files we had not decided on a good place to > store. This issue should hopefully be solved soon with the publishing of > our 'official' test dataset. > > That being said, I know that most if not all of the test plans had to be > amended due to the recent changes with storage engines. I wanted to see > what everyones' thoughts would be regarding the possibility of generating > test plans though some programmatic interface, which would allow for easy > changes to the code inside of the plan builder to replace the task of > manually re-writing plans as the syntax changes. I know this should not > happen often, so it may be more work than it is worth. > > -Jason Altekruse >
