-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21941/#review45346
-----------------------------------------------------------



exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/templates/CorrelationTypeFunctions.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21941/#comment80158>

    Correct the comment to indicate the right function names



exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/templates/CorrelationTypeFunctions.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21941/#comment80159>

    You can probably get rid of the 'if' here. Since you always have the 
aliasname.



exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/templates/CorrelationTypeFunctions.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21941/#comment80160>

    which method/ formula are you using to compute the correlation coefficient? 
Do you think if it might suffer from catastrophic cancellation problem?


- Mehant Baid


On May 27, 2014, 8:24 p.m., Yash Sharma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21941/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 27, 2014, 8:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for drill, Aditya Kishore, Mehant Baid, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: drill-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added implementation for Correlation coefficient calculation function.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/config.fmpp 5c0d03b 
>   exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/data/CorrelationTypes.tdd PRE-CREATION 
>   exec/java-exec/src/main/codegen/templates/CorrelationTypeFunctions.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/exec/fn/impl/TestAggregateFunction.java
>  ffb372d 
>   exec/java-exec/src/test/resources/functions/test_covariance.json 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21941/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Yes.
> $mvn test -Dtest=TestAggregateFunction#testCovarianceCorrelation
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yash Sharma
> 
>

Reply via email to