+1 Definitely like the versioning switch, is much clearer and conforms to other projects.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Yash Sharma <yash...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. Would really love to see a release. > It would be great if we can have prioritized JIRA's - labelled with 0.4 and > we can focus solely on those for this week. > > Peace, > Yash > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hey Everybody, > > > > It has been too long since our last release. So much good stuff has been > > done in master but we have no release with which people can experiment. > We > > need to do a better job of releasing early and often. I think the > monthly > > cycle that Optiq and Spark uses works very well and propose we move to > that > > model. > > > > To kick this off, I propose we do a release next week that is our first > > development point release that supports distributed execution. There are > > probably a dozen outstanding patches that would be good to get into this > > release and I'd like to try to target those but ultimately time-bound the > > release. > > > > With releasing comes a discussion of version numbers. While we initially > > started out with a milestone versioning scheme, the feedback I've > received > > is that it doesn't fit what people expect. As such, I propose moving to > a > > more traditional point release scheme. > > > > I think that we're probably a month or so away from a good beta release > > which I think would fairly be considered a 0.5 release. As such, I > propose > > that we release 0.4 next week and then increment each month, targeting a > > 1.0 release towards the end of the year. > > > > In summary, my release proposal is to target something similar to: > > July: 0.4 (dev preview) > > August: 0.5 (beta) > > September: 0.6 > > Oct: 0.7 > > ... > > EOY: 1.0 (ga) > > > > I think this more frequent release will help users to understand what > Drill > > is all about and let them start to experiment with their workloads. This > > should also drive additional community engagement and new contributions > > which is what this is all about. > > > > thanks, > > Jacques > > >