+1  Definitely like the versioning switch, is much clearer and conforms to
other projects.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Yash Sharma <yash...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1. Would really love to see a release.
> It would be great if we can have prioritized JIRA's - labelled with 0.4 and
> we can focus solely on those for this week.
>
> Peace,
> Yash
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Everybody,
> >
> > It has been too long since our last release.  So much good stuff has been
> > done in master but we have no release with which people can experiment.
>  We
> > need to do a better job of releasing early and often.  I think the
> monthly
> > cycle that Optiq and Spark uses works very well and propose we move to
> that
> > model.
> >
> > To kick this off, I propose we do a release next week that is our first
> > development point release that supports distributed execution.  There are
> > probably a dozen outstanding patches that would be good to get into this
> > release and I'd like to try to target those but ultimately time-bound the
> > release.
> >
> > With releasing comes a discussion of version numbers.  While we initially
> > started out with a milestone versioning scheme, the feedback I've
> received
> > is that it doesn't fit what people expect.  As such, I propose moving to
> a
> > more traditional point release scheme.
> >
> > I think that we're probably a month or so away from a good beta release
> > which I think would fairly be considered a 0.5 release.  As such, I
> propose
> > that we release 0.4 next week and then increment each month, targeting a
> > 1.0 release towards the end of the year.
> >
> > In summary, my release proposal is to target something similar to:
> > July: 0.4 (dev preview)
> > August: 0.5 (beta)
> > September: 0.6
> > Oct: 0.7
> > ...
> > EOY: 1.0 (ga)
> >
> > I think this more frequent release will help users to understand what
> Drill
> > is all about and let them start to experiment with their workloads.  This
> > should also drive additional community engagement and new contributions
> > which is what this is all about.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Jacques
> >
>

Reply via email to