I think it needs to be of this form:

./sqlline -u "jdbc:drill:zk=<zk quorum>;schema=<schema name>"

Note that I have semicolon, not colon, separating zk qorum from schema.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:19 AM, mufy <[email protected]> wrote:

> Also, the sqlline prompt does not reflect the current schema connected to:
>
> 0: jdbc:drill:schema=sys:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181> use dfs;
> +------------+------------+
> |     ok     |  summary   |
> +------------+------------+
> | true       | Default schema changed to 'dfs' |
> +------------+------------+
> 1 row selected (0.052 seconds)
>
> 0: jdbc:drill:schema=sys:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181>
>
>
> [root@n69 bin]# ./sqlline -u jdbc:drill:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181,n73:5181 -n
> admin -p admin
> sqlline version 1.1.6
>
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181,n73:5181> use sys;
> +------------+------------+
> |     ok     |  summary   |
> +------------+------------+
> | true       | Default schema changed to 'sys' |
> +------------+------------+
> 1 row selected (0.184 seconds)
>
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181,n73:5181>
>
>
> ---
> Mufeed Usman
> My LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mufeed-usman/28/254/400> | My
> Social Cause <http://www.vision2016.org.in/> | My Blogs : LiveJournal
> <http://mufeed.livejournal.com>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:06 PM, mufy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > *[CONCERN 1]*
> >
> > I can connect in the following 2 ways,
> >
> > METHOD 1 : sqlline -u jdbc:drill:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181,n73:5181 -n admin
> > -p admin (Not specifying schema)
> > METHOD 2 : sqlline -u jdbc:drill:schema=sys:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181,n73:5181
> > -n admin -p admin (Specifying schema)
> >
> > Like in SQL, I was under the impression that once directly connected to
> > the schema I'd not have to explicitly specify the schema when querying
> the
> > table. But it did not seem to work. For example,
> >
> > [root@n69 bin]# ./sqlline -u
> > jdbc:drill:schema=sys:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181,n73:5181 -n admin -p admin
> > sqlline version 1.1.6
> > 0: jdbc:drill:schema=sys:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181> show tables;
> > Query failed: Failure while parsing sql. No schema selected. Select a
> > schema using 'USE schema' command [d4114b19-095f-409b-bb46-5e940c328c91]
> >
> > Error: exception while executing query: Failure while trying to get next
> > result batch. (state=,code=0)
> >
> > 0: jdbc:drill:schema=sys:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181> select * from drillbits;
> > Query failed: Failure while parsing sql. Table 'drillbits' not found
> > [d28fa64c-13a4-4b7c-a6ea-8e77f1a3b243]
> >
> > Error: exception while executing query: Failure while trying to get next
> > result batch. (state=,code=0)
> >
> >
> > But it worked only when I specified `schema`.`table`. Is that the
> expected
> > behavior?
> >
> > 0: jdbc:drill:schema=sys:zk=n69:5181,n72:5181> select * from
> sys.drillbits;
> > +------------+------------+--------------+------------+
> > |    host    | user_port  | control_port | data_port  |
> > +------------+------------+--------------+------------+
> > | n69        | 31010      | 31011        | 31012      |
> > +------------+------------+--------------+------------+
> > 1 row selected (0.191 seconds)
> >
> >
> > *[CONCERN 2]*
> >
> > What's the advantage of specifying the ZK ensemble in the sqlline
> > connection string? With the way PStore is handled now (directly on the
> > HDFS), is it relevant anymore?
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Mufeed Usman
> > My LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mufeed-usman/28/254/400> | My
> > Social Cause <http://www.vision2016.org.in/> | My Blogs : LiveJournal
> > <http://mufeed.livejournal.com>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
 Steven Phillips
 Software Engineer

 mapr.com

Reply via email to