----- Original Message -----
>Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:29:02 -0700
>From: "Garrett D'Amore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Joost Mulders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [driver-discuss] [networking-discuss] Yet another VIA Rhine
>       ethernet driver
>
>
>Joost,
>
>A couple of comments:
>
>1) Great job!  This driver looks really clean, and well written.  I'm 
>fairly impressed.

me too!

>2) The "vfe" driver is being worked for inclusion into Nevada someday 
>soon.   Its too bad this duplication of effort exists, because, your 
>driver looks quite nice.
>
>3) FYI, the ndd ioctls which you've figured out are going to be defunct 
>really soon, thanks to PSARC 2007/429, aka Brussels.
>
>4) I wonder if the common interrupt blanking feature of Nemo/GLDv3 is a 
>better solution to using a separate task to handle your polling.  
>Crossbow should fix that, in any case.
>    -- Garrett
>
>Joost Mulders wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am happy to announce the availability of yet another driver ("vr")  
>> for a few
>> of the VIA Rhine fast Ethernet controllers:
>>
>>   VIA Rhine VT6102 Fast Ethernet, pci1106,3065
>>   VIA Rhine VT6105 Fast Ethernet, pci1106,3106
>>
>> A package with both sparc and intel binaries is at
>>   http://joostm.nl/solaris/vr/VR_1_09/via-rhine-ethernet.pkg
>> Source is at
>>   http://joostm.nl/solaris/vr/VR_1_09/
>>
>> The reason for existance of this driver is a bit of a story:
>> A long time ago, I bought an VIA EPIA board for use as a low-power  
>> home server.
>> At that time, rh didn't work too well for me, so I installed BSD and  
>> decided
>> (being naive) to write a new driver as an educational excersise.
>> I took a luxury amount of time for that ....
>> Meanwhile rh (now vfe) works very well. I completed vr just for the  
>> sake of
>> completion.
>>
>> vr is a GLD3 driver created with an eye on CPU utilization, because  
>> my EPIA
>> doesn't have too much of that :-)

A random question:

 Would you tell me on the CPU utilization in 100M bps transfer
with or without the cyclic task?

I guess the CPU usage is about 50% on your EPIA without the cyclic task.

Masayuki Murayama
_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss

Reply via email to