Garrett D'Amore writes: > Thanks for your sage advice Jim. I agree wholeheartedly. (And I did > suggest that to jmcp that PSARC'ing this if you knew you weren't going > to get past CTeam was not necessarily a great idea. Maybe that's my error.) > > Btw, the issue is not just with names of HBAs, but how they name and > address the target nodes that will be used by SD. Care must be taken > that the *full* path doesn't change.
Ah, good point; I'd missed that. But that's something to bring up in the ARC review, as it's an upgrade constraint. ;-} -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ driver-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
