On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:26:19 +0000
Javen Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> It's weird, I am seeing different devid for different volumes on my 
> system with my new driver.
> Could you help send the output of prtconf -v /dev/dsk/cxtydzp0?
> cxtydz means your IBM serveRAID volume.

Here's the same sections as what you gave; if anything else is needed,
just let me know. (And thanks for the GUID explanation.)

# prtconf -v /dev/dsk/c3t0d0p0
sd, instance #0
[snip]
    Hardware properties:
        name='devid' type=string items=1
            value='id1,[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
        name='inquiry-revision-id' type=string items=1
            value='V1.0'
        name='inquiry-product-id' type=string items=1
            value='ServeRAID Vol0'
        name='inquiry-device-type' type=int items=1
            value=00000000
[snip]

# prtconf -v /dev/dsk/c3t1d0p0
sd, instance #1
[snip]
    Hardware properties:
        name='devid' type=string items=1
            value='id1,[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
        name='inquiry-revision-id' type=string items=1
            value='V1.0'
        name='inquiry-product-id' type=string items=1
            value='ServeRAID Vol1'
        name='inquiry-device-type' type=int items=1
            value=00000000
[snip]

> BTW, can I ask why u want to use SVM on top of RAID volume? Since you 
> have hardware
> RAID, why you need SVM software RAID?

Yes, I know this isn't a common usage :). Well, for one thing, it's
impossible as of right now to manipulate the raid configuration at all
from Solaris, and SVM would give me some flexibility. And using SVM
makes LiveUpgrade possible while still RAID1'ing the only drives I have
in the system.

I realize I don't need the RAID controller at all for this, but it's in
the machine now, and I don't have physical access for awhile. I'd be
fine with bypassing the RAID controller altogether, but from the
reading I've done, this appears to not be possible (at least, without
taking out the card or something). And hey, it lets me troubleshoot a
driver.

> Anyway, we should make ips driver better. Thanks for your information 
> and testing.

Thanks for your updates! And I'd be happy to test more versions of the
driver as you wish.

-- 
Andrew Deason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgpNknGCR5qvD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss

Reply via email to