Garrett D'Amore wrote: > For dnet, leave it zero. The idea is that some NICs have more than one > port per devinfo instance. dnet isn't one of those. :-)
Gotcha. I guess what threw me was hackintr_f (dnet.c:358) tracks multiple gld_mac_info_t instances (up to 8). > Yes, it would require multiple invocations. And yes, you'd have > multiple mac_handle_t's. But again, for most NICs you never need this. Makes sense. If one were to come across a NIC that needs this, would it make sense to re-use the mac_register_t instance between mac_register() calls (after making the appropriate modifications)? Steve _______________________________________________ driver-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
