Peter Memishian wrote:
> > > hme.c:4035 - Is there a specific reason why the conditional specifically
> > > uses a != 0 rather than just 'hmep->hme_flags & HMESUSPENDED'? I thought
> > > this looked a little out of place since other conditionals in hme.c do
> not
> > > seem to follow this behavior.
> > >
> >
> > Actually, I think a few other places I also used != 0. Although
> > compilers evaluate it the same way, I prefer to make comparison against
> > zero explicit. I thought at one point I'd even seen a style guide
> > recommending or requiring this.
>
> Really? I don't recall anything about that.
>
I don't recall where I saw it. It *could* just be weird neuron
misfires in my brain.
-- Garrett
> --
> meem
> _______________________________________________
> networking-discuss mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
driver-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
