I am afriad there are bunch of hardcoded check in i915 driver, like,
IS_945GM(), IS_G33().  I  think we should fix these MACROs before the
device alias is added.

Venu Chis
> -bash-3.2$ uname -achip 
> SunOS lippert 5.11 snv_100 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
> -bash-3.2$ /usr/sbin/smbios | grep Wake
>   Wake-Up Event: 0x6 (power switch)
>
> and the instrumented i915 I have installed on the
> system is based on the following command on oct15(not
> sure if it matters):
>
> wget
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/on-src.tar.bz2
>
> Please advise anything else I could try.
>
> Thanks,
> Venu.
> --- Randy Fishel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>>   Can you remind us again what actual release you
>> are using?
>>
>>   I can understand that a keypress might not wake
>> the machine, but the 
>> power button should (especially if the alarm does). 
>> There was a 
>> problem not too long ago with the backlite not
>> turning on, but some of 
>> these issues are supposed to be fixed.  So it will
>> be useful to know 
>> where you are in the release path.
>>
>>      ---- Randy
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Venu C wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Setting acpi_rtc-wake to 6sec, I noticed system
>>>       
>> being
>>     
>>> resumed in /var/adm/messages
>>>  
>>> 12:27:29 System is being suspended
>>> 12:27:48 System has been resumed
>>>
>>> Is this because Display backlight doesnot turn on
>>> after
>>> resume?
>>>
>>> is there any known workaround for i915 driver or 
>>> Intel (0x8086, 0x8108) graphics controller.
>>>
>>> without autowake up setting, I still dont see
>>>       
>> resume
>>     
>>> event logged on reset(after waitng a while)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> venu.
>>>
>>> --- Venu C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Now I tried to disable the iprb with the
>>>>         
>> suggested
>>     
>>>> method over rem_drv approach(the mail, where I
>>>> informed the results before I receive this).
>>>>
>>>> uadmin 3 22 is working fine.
>>>>
>>>> uadmin 3 20:
>>>>
>>>>  - suspend is fine
>>>>  - resume part is not working
>>>>     . by pressing any key didnot resume  
>>>>     . In my platform I have power, reset, wake
>>>> buttons
>>>>     . When I press Wake and Power buttons, I
>>>>         
>> dont
>>     
>>>> see
>>>>       cpr resume.
>>>>     . after few tries, and then power cycle
>>>>         
>> system
>>     
>>>>       boots normally
>>>>
>>>> Did I need to change any BIOS PowerManagement
>>>> parameters? or anything else missing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Venu.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- Randy Fishel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>   So it looks like you might have a
>>>>>           
>> framebuffer
>>     
>>>>> solution.  But IIRC, 
>>>>> you are constrained by IPRB.  A next test
>>>>>           
>> would be
>>     
>>>>> to disable this 
>>>>> driver from loading by adding:
>>>>>
>>>>>     -B disable-iprb=true
>>>>>
>>>>> to the grub $kernel line, and see if it will
>>>>>           
>> now
>>     
>>>>> suspend (try 'uadmin 
>>>>> 3 22 first).  I would be interested in your
>>>>>           
>>>> results.
>>>>         
>>>>>   ---- Randy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Venu C wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> edward,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    I had instrumented the driver not to
>>>>>>             
>> check
>>     
>>>> the
>>>>         
>>>>>> pciidlist by drm_probe, the driver is
>>>>>>             
>>>> successfully
>>>>         
>>>>>> installed on ATOM platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # prtconf -D | grep i915
>>>>>>         display, instance #0 (driver name:
>>>>>>             
>> i915)
>>     
>>>>>> # 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # cat /etc/name_to_major | grep i915
>>>>>> i915 99
>>>>>> # uadmin 3 25 99
>>>>>> # 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oct 23 14:40:14 lippert genunix: [ID 535284
>>>>>> kern.notice] System is being suspended
>>>>>> Oct 23 14:40:18 lippert The system is back
>>>>>>             
>> where
>>     
>>>>> you
>>>>>           
>>>>>> left!
>>>>>> Oct 23 14:40:18 lippert genunix: [ID 583038
>>>>>> kern.notice] System has been resumed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think (0x8086, 0x8108) also could be added
>>>>>>             
>>>> into
>>>>         
>>>>> the
>>>>>           
>>>>>> supported device list for i915.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Venu.
>>>>>> --- "edward.shu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Venu C:
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Kerry,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   is i915 is not supporting, is just
>>>>>>>>                 
>> because
>>     
>>>>> it is
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> claiming the device. or the hardware
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>> interface
>>>>         
>>>>> to 
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> graphic device (0x8086, 0x8108) is
>>>>>>>>                 
>> supported
>>     
>>>>> by
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> i915
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> it is not compatible to i915 supported
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>> hardware.
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> Since the generic vgatext, is claiming
>>>>>>>>                 
>> and
>>     
>>>>> device
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>>> fine. As a simple test, if I add a
>>>>>>>>                 
>> driver
>>     
>>>>> alias
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> i915 "pci8086,8108" will it work?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Venu.
>>>>>>>> --- Kerry Shu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> i915 was supposed to support all the Intel
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> graphics
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> chips for PC.
>>>>>>> However,  we can not test  all of the
>>>>>>>               
>> hardware
>>     
>>>>>>> before the integration,
>>>>>>> so some chip IDs may not be included in
>>>>>>>               
>> the
>>     
>>>>>>> supported list.   As to
>>>>>>> "pci8086,8108",  is it a graphics chip
>>>>>>>               
>>>> embedded
>>>>         
>>>>> in
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> ATOM platform?
>>>>>>> It may be different from Intel graphics
>>>>>>>               
>> for
>>     
>>>> PC.
>>>>         
>>>>>>>>                 
>> _______________________________________________
>>     
>>>>>>>> driver-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
>   
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> driver-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss

Reply via email to