Hi Alan,

Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Wow, don't hear about the wacom tablet driver for years, then two messages
> in one day...
>
> max at bruningsystems.com wrote:
>   
>> Hi.
>> I sent the following to the driver list, (and one or two other mailing 
>> lists), and
>> it was suggested I post something here...
>>
>> I have written a driver (and X input extension library) for Wacom pen 
>> tablets.  
>>     
>
> Cool.   By "X input extension library" I assume you mean a loadable .so
> module for the Xorg server?
>   
Yes.  wacom_drv.so
>   
>> Currently, the tablet must be identified in an xorg.conf 
>> file.  I am trying to figure out how
>> to do this with hal and an fdi file, but haven't figured that out yet.  
>>     
>
> The Xorg currently in OpenSolaris doesn't do hal/fdi yet - we're in the
> process of getting the hal in ON updated with the necessary support so
> we can switch to that with the Xorg 1.5 release I'm working to integrate
> soon.   (See the messages posted last month to xwin-discuss for info on
> the test binaries of this work.)
>
>   
Thanks.  It was suggested to me that I look at the tamarack project.
I am now subscribed to the mailing list, which, by the way, has a ton of
spam at the beginning...
>> So, is anyone interested in this?  What steps do I need to take to get 
>> this into OpenSolaris?  Is someone in Sun already working on this?
>>     
>
> I don't know of anyone working on wacom specifically - our USB driver team
> is working on adding more input device support in general, but I don't know
> which specific devices.   As noted in the earlier thread today, we had Xorg
> wacom support in the past, but it was dropped when X.Org dropped their
> driver in X11R7.0 in favor of the GPL-licensed linuxwacom driver, which we
> can't use since we don't think GPL will allow us to link a GPL'ed linuxwacom
> and a closed source graphics driver into the same Xorg binary, and we ship
> several closed source graphics drivers.
>   
I have exchanged email with a few people about this now, and it seems that
the only way I can distribute the software (in binary or source form) and
keep all the lawyers happy with license compliance, is to re-write the 
software to
either do everything with CDDL, or everything with GPL.  To get the 
software into
ON, I must do the former.  What about making the wacom STREAMS module GPL?
I understand that OpenSolaris (i.e., Sun) cannot use this since then the 
entire
kernel would have to use this license.  But what about third party 
kernel modules?
Can I use the LGPL license so that my module can be linked into the kernel?

On a side note, I tried to ignore most of the licensing discussions for 
the past x years.
Now, I find that it actually may be important.  What a PITA...  I am 
also worried that
someone is going to tell me to talk with a lawyer.  I have no budget for 
speaking
with lawyers at this time.

Thanks,
max


Reply via email to