On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:36:38PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Only the first patch could be applied. Can you refresh this series, and
> your other one (fixing the issues pointed out there), and resend them
> please?

We've incorporated all of Dan's fixes and suggestions and rebased the
whole series on staging-next.
We left the protocol version at 0x111, since the code is backwards
compatible with current linux-linus if encryption is disabled.
After reading "NIST Special Publication 800-38D" Appendix C we got some
doubts about the security of our usage of gcm with short (4 bytes) tags,
so we incremented USBIP_AUTHSIZE to 16, just to be safe.

Thanks,
Tobias and Dominik
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to