On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:49:18PM +0100, Denis Carikli wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > index fc2adb6..586c12f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > @@ -537,6 +537,15 @@ int drm_display_mode_from_videomode(const struct > videomode *vm, > dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN; > if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_DOUBLECLK) > dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK; > + if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_LOW) > + dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_DE_LOW; > + if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_HIGH) > + dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_DE_HIGH; > + if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_POSEDGE) > + dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE; > + if (vm->flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE) > + dmode->flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE; > +
I'm still not convinced that these should be exposed in *any* way to userspace - I'm with Ville Syrjälä on this point. Yes, you've moved their definition out of a uapi header file, but they're still leaking out of kernel space via calls (and with Xorg, they'll leak into the DisplayMode structures within the X server.) Now, here's the thing... The polarity of the display enable signal. That's a property of the connected device right? It doesn't change with respect to the displayed mode unlike the hsync/vsync signals. If that's true, it should not be here. Same goes for the pixel clock edge. If it's a property of the connected device and doesn't have a dependence on the displayed mode, then it should not be in the DRM mode structure. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
