Please tell me if the following fixes are appropriate. In particular, I am 
uncertain of
the __force attributes.

Thanks,

Larry


Sparse lists the following:

  CHECK   drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c:1156:63: warning: restricted 
__sum16 degrades to integer
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c:1160:69: warning: incorrect type in 
assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c:1160:69:    expected restricted 
__sum16 [usertype] check
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c:1160:69:    got int

---
 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 47 +++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c 
b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
index 5425bc5..54a706f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c

@@ -1153,11 +1154,11 @@ void dhcp_flag_bcast(struct adapter *priv, struct 
sk_buff *skb)
                                                        /*  or BROADCAST flag */
                                                        dhcph->flags |= 
htons(BROADCAST_FLAG);
                                                        /*  recalculate 
checksum */
-                                                       sum = ~(udph->check) & 
0xffff;
+                                                       sum = (__force 
int)(~(udph->check)) & 0xffff;
                                                        sum += 
be16_to_cpu(dhcph->flags);
                                                        while (sum >> 16)
                                                                sum = (sum & 
0xffff) + (sum >> 16);
-                                                       udph->check = ~sum;
+                                                       udph->check = (__force 
__sum16)(~sum);
                                                }
                                        }
                                }
-- 
1.8.4

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to