On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:56:29AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 04:47 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:54:50PM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> >>@@ -2953,7 +2955,8 @@ static int dgap_tty_write(struct tty_struct *tty,
> >>const unsigned char *buf, int
> >> if (down_interruptible(&dgap_TmpWriteSem))
> >> return -EINTR;
> >>
> >>- if (copy_from_user(dgap_TmpWriteBuf, (const uchar __user *)
> >>buf, count)) {
> >>+ if (copy_from_user(dgap_TmpWriteBuf, (const uchar __user *)buf,
> >>+ count)) {
> >> up(&dgap_TmpWriteSem);
> >> return -EFAULT;
> >> }
> >
> >This is dead code btw. "from_user" is always false.
> >
>
> Are you saying that copy_from_user can never return anything but 0?
No. This code looks buggy so I looked at the context. There is
"from_user" variable which is always zero. The buggy code is dead code.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
