On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:07:42AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 1:46 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de; a...@canonical.com; > > jasow...@redhat.com > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Include the limit on the number > > of pfns we can handle > > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:15:08PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > Increase the maximum number of pfns we can handle is a single vmbus > > packet. > > ^^ in > > Thanks Dan. I am traveling in India and it shows. I have already sent a > corrected patch. >
Yeah. I saw that. Thanks. > > > > > > > What are the user visible effects of this patch? > The current code will drop these packets that have more PFNs than the limit. > Upping the limit will mitigate this problem. > Meanwhile, the revised patch says that it is not a bugfix. It sort of sounds like upping the limit does improve performance for some people? I am confused now. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
