On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 03:31:18PM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
> I added a couple of breaks, and a /* FALLTHROUGH */ comment to switch/case
> assuming that is the actual desired effect needed by the case label.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gary Alan Rookard <garyrook...@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> On branch staging-next
>  drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c
> index 4cb59d7..9252ef1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c
> @@ -1678,8 +1678,7 @@ bool CmControlResponseMessage(struct bcm_mini_adapter 
> *Adapter,  /* <Pointer to
>               *((struct bcm_add_indication_alt 
> *)&(Adapter->caDsxReqResp[LEADER_SIZE]))
>                       = *pstAddIndication;
>               ((struct bcm_add_indication_alt 
> *)&(Adapter->caDsxReqResp[LEADER_SIZE]))->u8Type = DSA_ACK;
> -
> -     } /* no break here..we should go down. */
> +     }       /* FALLTHROUGH */
>       case DSA_ACK:
>       {
>  
> @@ -1787,6 +1786,7 @@ bool CmControlResponseMessage(struct bcm_mini_adapter 
> *Adapter,  /* <Pointer to
>               BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_OTHERS, CONN_MSG, 
> DBG_LVL_ALL, "SENDING DSC ACK TO MAC %d", pLeader->PLength);
>               *((struct bcm_change_indication 
> *)&(Adapter->caDsxReqResp[LEADER_SIZE])) = *pstChangeIndication;
>               ((struct bcm_change_indication 
> *)&(Adapter->caDsxReqResp[LEADER_SIZE]))->u8Type = DSC_ACK;
> +             break;
>       }
>       case DSC_ACK:
>       {
> @@ -1865,6 +1865,7 @@ bool CmControlResponseMessage(struct bcm_mini_adapter 
> *Adapter,  /* <Pointer to
>               BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_OTHERS, CONN_MSG, 
> DBG_LVL_ALL, "SENDING DSD RESPONSE TO MAC");
>               ((struct bcm_del_indication 
> *)&(Adapter->caDsxReqResp[LEADER_SIZE]))->u8Type = DSD_RSP;
>               CopyBufferToControlPacket(Adapter, 
> (PVOID)Adapter->caDsxReqResp);
> +             break;

Are you _sure_ these two changes are ok?  Do you have a device to test?
If not, I can't really take this patch as it does change the logic
involved here :(

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to