[snip] > > That sounds more sensible. I've also just noticed that I introduced a bug in > > the first patch when rebasing it :-/, so let's hold off on the whole series > > and I'll do a proper tidy and resend after the next merge window. > > Is the bug the memory leak if lm3554_platform_data_func() fails? > > regards, > dan carpenter >
> Nope. I put a "return ret" for the last check instead of "goto err_del_timer"... The version of this code in linux-next does the correct "if (PTR_ERR(...))" check after calling lm3554_platform_data_func(), but this patch doesn't seem to have made its way into linux-media yet. All the more reason to resend my patches after the merge window, I suppose. Best, Alex _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
