On 18/10/2020 20:48, Deepak R Varma wrote:
Boolean comparison of the condition inside unittest function is unnecessary and can be simplified by directly using the condition outcome for evaluation. Issue reported by : scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolinit.cocciSigned-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2...@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c index eaefaf596a37..7db83cf5e4aa 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/tests/ni_routes_test.c @@ -499,13 +499,13 @@ void test_route_register_is_valid(void) const struct ni_route_tables *T = &private.routing_tables;init_pci_fake();- unittest(route_register_is_valid(4, O(4), T) == false, + unittest(!route_register_is_valid(4, O(4), T), "check for bad source 4-->4\n"); - unittest(route_register_is_valid(0, O(1), T) == true, + unittest(!route_register_is_valid(0, O(1), T), "find first source\n"); - unittest(route_register_is_valid(4, O(6), T) == true, + unittest(!route_register_is_valid(4, O(6), T), "find middle source\n"); - unittest(route_register_is_valid(9, O(8), T) == true, + unittest(!route_register_is_valid(9, O(8), T), "find last source"); }
NAK. It looks like you have inadvertently inverted some of the tests. -- -=( Ian Abbott <abbo...@mev.co.uk> || MEV Ltd. is a company )=- -=( registered in England & Wales. Regd. number: 02862268. )=- -=( Regd. addr.: S11 & 12 Building 67, Europa Business Park, )=- -=( Bird Hall Lane, STOCKPORT, SK3 0XA, UK. || www.mev.co.uk )=- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
