On 1/3/21 4:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>

clang warns about excessive stack usage in this driver when
UBSAN is enabled:

drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c:977:12: error: stack frame size of 
1836 bytes in function 'gbaudio_tplg_create_widget' 
[-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]

Rework this code to no longer use compound literals for
initializing the structure in each case, but instead keep
the common bits in a preallocated constant array and copy
them as needed.

This is good, but I have a few comments.

You took out the default case, and it seems you are using
a w->type value bigger than the initialization array to
determine validity.  But there are more values defined in
the snd_soc_dapm_type enumerated type than are explicitly
listed as cases in the switch statement.  So the switch
statement no longer treats some types as invalid (such
as snd_soc_dapm_demux).  Am I missing something?

You are setting explicit names, such as "spk", "hp",
"mic", etc. in the initialization array.  But you
update the name after (struct) assigning from the
array.  I have no real objection I guess, but why
bother?  Why not just use null pointers in the
initialization array?

You change a semicolon to a comma in one spot, and you
should not have.  I'll point that out below.

I like that you got rid of the type casts, which were
apparently unnecessary.

You dropped the break in the final case in the switch
statement, but in an earlier discussion I think we
concluded that wasn't a problem.

I guess the main thing is the first thing mentioned.


Thanks.

                                        -Alex

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
  drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c | 106 ++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c 
b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
index 96b8b29fe899..c03873915c20 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
@@ -974,6 +974,44 @@ static int gbaudio_widget_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget 
*w,
        return ret;
  }
+static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget gbaudio_widgets[] = {
+       [snd_soc_dapm_spk]      = SND_SOC_DAPM_SPK("spk", gbcodec_event_spk),
+       [snd_soc_dapm_hp]       = SND_SOC_DAPM_HP("hp", gbcodec_event_hp),
+       [snd_soc_dapm_mic]      = SND_SOC_DAPM_MIC("mic", 
gbcodec_event_int_mic),

. . .

@@ -1050,78 +1088,28 @@ static int gbaudio_tplg_create_widget(struct 
gbaudio_module_info *module,
        strlcpy(temp_name, w->name, NAME_SIZE);
        snprintf(w->name, NAME_SIZE, "GB %d %s", module->dev_id, temp_name);
+ if (w->type > ARRAY_SIZE(gbaudio_widgets)) {
+               ret = -EINVAL;
+               goto error;
+       }
+       *dw = gbaudio_widgets[w->type];
+       dw->name = w->name;
+
        switch (w->type) {
        case snd_soc_dapm_spk:
-               *dw = (struct snd_soc_dapm_widget)
-                       SND_SOC_DAPM_SPK(w->name, gbcodec_event_spk);
                module->op_devices |= GBAUDIO_DEVICE_OUT_SPEAKER;
                break;
        case snd_soc_dapm_hp:
-               *dw = (struct snd_soc_dapm_widget)
-                       SND_SOC_DAPM_HP(w->name, gbcodec_event_hp);
                module->op_devices |= (GBAUDIO_DEVICE_OUT_WIRED_HEADSET
-                                       | GBAUDIO_DEVICE_OUT_WIRED_HEADPHONE);
+                                       | GBAUDIO_DEVICE_OUT_WIRED_HEADPHONE),

Please fix this (above) to preserve the original semicolon.

                module->ip_devices |= GBAUDIO_DEVICE_IN_WIRED_HEADSET;
                break;
        case snd_soc_dapm_mic:
-               *dw = (struct snd_soc_dapm_widget)
-                       SND_SOC_DAPM_MIC(w->name, gbcodec_event_int_mic);
                module->ip_devices |= GBAUDIO_DEVICE_IN_BUILTIN_MIC;
                break;

. . .
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to