On 2/11/21 05:06, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:49:37PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
>> a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
>> should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
>> style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
>>
>> Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
>> struct ndis_80211_var_ie, instead of a one-element array.
>>
>> Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and
>> fix the following warnings:
>>
>>   CC [M]  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.o
>> In file included from ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/drv_types.h:20,
>>                  from drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:9:
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c: In function 
>> ‘HT_caps_handler’:
>> ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:108:11: warning: array 
>> subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} 
>> [-Warray-bounds]
>>   108 |  (EF1BYTE(*((u8 *)(__pstart))))
>>       |           ^
>> ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:42:8: note: in definition 
>> of macro ‘EF1BYTE’
>>    42 |  ((u8)(_val))
>>       |        ^~~~
>> ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:127:4: note: in expansion 
>> of macro ‘LE_P1BYTE_TO_HOST_1BYTE’
>>   127 |   (LE_P1BYTE_TO_HOST_1BYTE(__pstart) >> (__bitoffset)) & \
>>       |    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_ht.h:97:55: note: in expansion of 
>> macro ‘LE_BITS_TO_1BYTE’
>>    97 | #define GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC(_pEleStart)     
>> LE_BITS_TO_1BYTE((_pEleStart)+1, 0, 2)
>>       |                                                       
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1104:58: note: in expansion 
>> of macro ‘GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC’
>>  1104 |   if (TEST_FLAG(phtpriv->stbc_cap, STBC_HT_ENABLE_TX) && 
>> GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC(pIE->data)) {
>>       |                                                          
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1051:75: warning: array 
>> subscript 2 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} 
>> [-Warray-bounds]
>>  1051 |    if ((pmlmeinfo->HT_caps.u.HT_cap_element.AMPDU_para & 0x3) > 
>> (pIE->data[i] & 0x3))
>>       |                                                                  
>> ~~~~~~~~~^~~
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c: In function ‘check_assoc_AP’:
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1606:19: warning: array 
>> subscript 4 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} 
>> [-Warray-bounds]
>>  1606 |      if (pIE->data[4] == 1)
>>       |          ~~~~~~~~~^~~
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1609:20: warning: array 
>> subscript 5 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} 
>> [-Warray-bounds]
>>  1609 |       if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_92SE)
>>       |           ~~~~~~~~~^~~
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1613:19: warning: array 
>> subscript 5 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} 
>> [-Warray-bounds]
>>  1613 |      if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_SOFTAP)
>>       |          ~~~~~~~~~^~~
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1617:20: warning: array 
>> subscript 6 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} 
>> [-Warray-bounds]
>>  1617 |       if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_BCUT) {
>>       |           ~~~~~~~~~^~~
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
>> [2] 
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
>> Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/602434b8.jc5doxj0bmhoxgil%25...@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org>
> 
> Looks okay to me.  I looked for potential issues with changing the
> sizeof the struct but couldn't find any.

Great. Yeah; that's one of the first things I look at when I make
these changes. Thanks for double checking. :)

> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>

Thanks!
--
Gustavo
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to