On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:49:55AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> writes:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:37:29AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme.c
> >> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme.c
> >> index b912d09..8c6b094 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme.c
> >> @@ -1027,9 +1027,8 @@ rtw_joinbss_update_stainfo(struct rtw_adapter
> >> *padapter,
> >> /* security related */
> >> if (padapter->securitypriv.dot11AuthAlgrthm ==
> >> dot11AuthAlgrthm_8021X) {
> >> - padapter->securitypriv.binstallGrpkey = false;
> >> - padapter->securitypriv.busetkipkey = false;
> >> - padapter->securitypriv.bgrpkey_handshake = false;
> >> + padapter->securitypriv.binstallGrpkey = 0;
> >> + padapter->securitypriv.busetkipkey = 0;
> >>
> >
> > You remove ->bgrpkey_handshake in this patch. That's fine because it
> > is a write-only variable. But that's should be in a separate patch and
> > described in the changelog next time.
>
> Dan,
>
> When cleaning up the mess of this driver, things happen.
Yes. I understand. Appology accepted. :P
> I can figure out when to submit things and when not to.
You are definitely awesome. :)
>
> If you find bugs, I certainly appreciate the reports but this is just
> -ENITPICK.
Don't get your drawers in a twist. I'm not saying you should redo the
patch. These are just mechanical comments I send to everyone so that
you will do it correctly next time.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
