Hey Dan,
Thanks for your patience, I have resubmitted via a new email. Hope that works.
Thanks,
Chaitanya
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:39:43PM -0700, Chaitanya Hazarey wrote:
>> Added a blank line after declarations to fix the following warnings issued
>> by checkpatch.pl:
>>
>> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:138: WARNING: Missing a blank
>> line after declarations
>> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:189: WARNING: Missing a blank
>> line after declarations
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Hazarey <c...@24.io>
>
> Still doesn't apply, I'm afraid.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
>> b/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
>> index a58251f..8e714a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
>> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int doit(int cmd, int if_index, int *data)
>> static int is_dev_sd(int if_index)
>> {
>> int ret = 0;
>> +
>> SET_BPLIB_INT_FN(is_bypass, int, if_index, ret);
>> return ret >= 0 ? 1 : 0;
>> }
>> @@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ static int is_bypass_dev(int if_index)
>> static int is_bypass(int if_index)
>> {
>> int ret = 0;
>> +
>> SET_BPLIB_INT_FN(is_bypass, int, if_index, ret);
>> if (ret < 0)
>
> There was supposed to be a blank line between the call to
> SET_BPLIB_INT_FN() and the return check and it got deleted for some
> reason.
>
> regards,
> dan carpetner
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
