On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:43:37PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> @@ -583,8 +585,51 @@ static int dgap_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const 
> struct pci_device_id *ent)
>       if (rc)
>               return rc;
>  
> -     dgap_numboards++;
> -     return dgap_firmware_load(pdev, ent->driver_data);
> +     brd = dgap_board[dgap_numboards++];

I don't like the way the current code uses dgap_numboards and hiding
the ++ in here makes it even worse.

My thinking is that dgap_found_board() shouldn't touch dgap_board[] but
instead of instead it should return a pointer to "brd".  Then the code
in dgap_init_one() does:

        brd = dgap_found_board();
        if (!brd)
                return -ENODEV;

        /* code until the end of the function */

        dgap_board[dgap_numboards++] = brd;
        return 0;

tty_free:
        /* error path */

This could be done in a follow on patch.

TODO-list: 2014-06-13: dgap: make dgap_found_board() return a brd pointer.

> +     rc = dgap_firmware_load(pdev, ent->driver_data, brd);
> +     if (rc)
> +             goto free_brd;
> +
> +     rc = dgap_alloc_flipbuf(brd);
> +     if (rc)
> +             goto free_brd;
> +
> +     rc = dgap_tty_register(brd);
> +     if (rc)
> +             goto free_flipbuf;
> +
> +     rc = dgap_request_irq(brd);
> +     if (rc)
> +             goto unregister_tty;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Do tty device initialization.
> +      */
> +     rc = dgap_tty_init(brd);
> +     if (rc < 0)
> +             goto free_irq;
> +
> +     rc = dgap_tty_register_ports(brd);
> +     if (rc)
> +             goto tty_free;
> +
> +     brd->state = BOARD_READY;
> +     brd->dpastatus = BD_RUNNING;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +
> +tty_free:
> +     dgap_tty_free(brd);
> +free_irq:
> +     dgap_free_irq(brd);
> +unregister_tty:
> +     dgap_tty_unregister(brd);
> +free_flipbuf:
> +     dgap_free_flipbuf(brd);
> +free_brd:
> +     kfree(brd);

This isn't complete.  We need a dgap_unfound_board() which frees brd
and calls the inverse of dgap_do_remap().  Obviously "found" and
"unfound" are not the smartest names in the universe.

That said, I'm inclined to say that we can fix this up in a later patch.
This patch is clearly an improvement on the existing code and I'm not
sure it's possible to fix *everything* in one go.

TODO-list:  2014-06-13: dgap: call dgap_unfound_board() on error in 
dgap_init_one()

> +     dgap_board[--dgap_numboards] = NULL;
> +     return rc;
>  }

regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to