On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:37:35AM -0500, Ken Cox wrote: > > On 06/25/2014 10:57 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:48:23AM -0500, Ken Cox wrote: > --snip-- > >> .id_table = virthba_id_table, > >> .probe = virthba_probe, > >> .remove = virthba_remove, > >>@@ -1413,9 +1413,6 @@ info_proc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, > >>size_t len, loff_t *offset) > >> length += sprintf(vbuf + length, "\nvirthba result queue poll > >> wait:%d usecs.\n", > >> rsltq_wait_usecs); > >>- length += sprintf(vbuf + length, > >>- "\nModule build: Date:%s Time:%s\n", > >>- __DATE__, __TIME__); > >> length += sprintf(vbuf + length, "\ninterrupts_rcvd = %llu, > >> interrupts_disabled = %llu\n", > >> virthbainfo->interrupts_rcvd, > >> virthbainfo->interrupts_disabled); > >Why not just delete this proc file entirely? You'll have to do that > >eventually anyway :) > Ben Romer is working on a patch set to remove all the proc files for the > Unisys drivers. He is travelling right now but I think he will be > submitting it in the next few days. Is it ok to leave this for now and let > his patches remove all proc entries at the same time?
That is fine. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
