Fix coding style issue where the if statement unnecessarily uses curly
braces for one line statements and where the else conditional statement
should follow the closing curly brace '}'. Also, the open curly brace
'{' should be on the same line as the if statement.

Signed-off-by: An Ha <zero579...@gmail.com>
---
 .../staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/hal_bt_coexist.c    | 21 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/hal_bt_coexist.c 
b/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/hal_bt_coexist.c
index 13cc5ba..d587072 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/hal_bt_coexist.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/hal_bt_coexist.c
@@ -78,17 +78,15 @@ struct rtl_phy *rtlphy = &(rtlpriv->phy);
 if (rtlpriv->link_info.b_busytraffic) {
        rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state &= ~BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_IDLE;
 
-       if (rtlpriv->link_info.b_tx_busy_traffic) {
+       if (rtlpriv->link_info.b_tx_busy_traffic)
                rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state |= 
BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_UPLINK;
-       } else {
+       else
                rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state &= 
~BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_UPLINK;
-       }
 
-       if (rtlpriv->link_info.b_rx_busy_traffic) {
+       if (rtlpriv->link_info.b_rx_busy_traffic)
                rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state |= 
BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_DOWNLINK;
-       } else {
+       else
                rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state &= 
~BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_DOWNLINK;
-       }
 } else {
        rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state |= BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_IDLE;
        rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state &= ~BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_UPLINK;
@@ -111,12 +109,11 @@ if (rtlpriv->mac80211.mode == WIRELESS_MODE_G
        }
 }
 
-if (bt_operation_on) {
+if (bt_operation_on)
        rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state |= BT_COEX_STATE_BT30;
-} else {
+else
        rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state &= ~BT_COEX_STATE_BT30;
 }
-}
 
 
 u8 rtl8821ae_dm_bt_check_coex_rssi_state1(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
@@ -254,8 +251,7 @@ u8 rtl8821ae_dm_bt_check_coex_rssi_state(struct 
ieee80211_hw *hw,
                                        ("[DM][BT], RSSI state stay at 
High\n"));
                        }
                }
-       }
-       else if (level_num == 3) {
+       } else if (level_num == 3) {
                if (rssi_thresh > rssi_thresh1) {
                        RT_TRACE(COMP_BT_COEXIST, DBG_TRACE,
                                ("[DM][BT], RSSI thresh error!!\n"));
@@ -292,8 +288,7 @@ u8 rtl8821ae_dm_bt_check_coex_rssi_state(struct 
ieee80211_hw *hw,
                                        &= ~BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_RSSI_MEDIUM;
                                RT_TRACE(COMP_BT_COEXIST, DBG_TRACE,
                                        ("[DM][BT], RSSI state switch to 
High\n"));
-                       } else if (undecoratedsmoothed_pwdb < rssi_thresh)
-                       {
+                       } else if (undecoratedsmoothed_pwdb < rssi_thresh) {
                                bt_rssi_state = BT_RSSI_STATE_LOW;
                                rtlpcipriv->btcoexist.current_state
                                        |= BT_COEX_STATE_WIFI_RSSI_LOW;
-- 
2.1.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to