On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:13:42PM +0100, Filipe Gonçalves wrote:
> This patch fixes a sparse warning on layout.c (ptlrpc) that was caused by 
> having preprocessor directives in the arguments to a macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Gonçalves <fil...@codinghighway.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
> index 5b83371..211df78 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
> @@ -978,10 +978,11 @@ struct req_msg_field RMF_CONN =
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(RMF_CONN);
>  
>  struct req_msg_field RMF_CONNECT_DATA =
> +#if LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE > OBD_OCD_VERSION(2, 7, 50, 0)
>       DEFINE_MSGF("cdata",
>                   RMF_F_NO_SIZE_CHECK /* we allow extra space for interop */,
> -#if LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE > OBD_OCD_VERSION(2, 7, 50, 0)
>                   sizeof(struct obd_connect_data),
> +                 lustre_swab_connect, NULL);

Ick ick ick.

Yeah, sparse might complain about this, but how about just properly
deleting the #ifdef entirely, and not perpetuate it even more?

It shouldn't be needed anymore now that the code is in the kernel tree.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to