The used approach actually cannot prevent new encoder interrupt to
appear, because interrupt handler can execute in different thread, and
in current implementation there is still race condition regarding this.
Also from practice the code with this change seems to work as stable as
before.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.ut...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c 
b/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c
index b9b61b9..30e09d9 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c
@@ -703,9 +703,7 @@ static int solo_ring_thread(void *data)
 
                if (timeout == -ERESTARTSYS || kthread_should_stop())
                        break;
-               solo_irq_off(solo_dev, SOLO_IRQ_ENCODER);
                solo_handle_ring(solo_dev);
-               solo_irq_on(solo_dev, SOLO_IRQ_ENCODER);
                try_to_freeze();
        }
 
-- 
1.8.5.5

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to