On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:43:07PM +0200, Aya Mahfouz wrote:
> This patches replaces one pr_debug call by dev_dbg and
> changes the device used by one of the dev_err calls.
i think you should mention in the commit message why you are changing the
device.
and also for revised patch its better if you add version number in the subject.
like this is v2.
thanks
sudip
>
> Signed-off-by: Aya Mahfouz <mahfouz.saif.elya...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> index 52f8e91..dca806a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const
> struct i2c_device_id *id)
> int ret;
> bool tx_probe = false;
>
> - pr_debug("%s: %s on i2c-%d (%s), client addr=0x%02x\n",
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s: %s on i2c-%d (%s), client addr=0x%02x\n",
> __func__, id->name, adap->nr, adap->name, client->addr);
>
> /*
> @@ -1631,7 +1631,7 @@ out_put_xx:
> out_put_ir:
> put_ir_device(ir, true);
> out_no_ir:
> - dev_err(ir->l.dev, "%s: probing IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) failed with %d\n",
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: probing IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) failed with
> %d\n",
> __func__, tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name, adap->nr,
> ret);
> mutex_unlock(&ir_devices_lock);
> --
> 1.9.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
