checkpatch complains about two indentation errors where the case
statements are on a higher indentation level than the corresponding
switch statement. This patch removes these errors.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Ruprecht <rup...@einserver.de>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c    | 36 +++++++++++------------
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 14 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
index b7b8f9b6..2a728df 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
@@ -1825,24 +1825,24 @@ int ldlm_run_ast_work(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct 
list_head *rpc_list,
        arg->list = rpc_list;
 
        switch (ast_type) {
-               case LDLM_WORK_BL_AST:
-                       arg->type = LDLM_BL_CALLBACK;
-                       work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_bl_ast_lock;
-                       break;
-               case LDLM_WORK_CP_AST:
-                       arg->type = LDLM_CP_CALLBACK;
-                       work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_cp_ast_lock;
-                       break;
-               case LDLM_WORK_REVOKE_AST:
-                       arg->type = LDLM_BL_CALLBACK;
-                       work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_revoke_ast_lock;
-                       break;
-               case LDLM_WORK_GL_AST:
-                       arg->type = LDLM_GL_CALLBACK;
-                       work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_gl_ast_lock;
-                       break;
-               default:
-                       LBUG();
+       case LDLM_WORK_BL_AST:
+               arg->type = LDLM_BL_CALLBACK;
+               work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_bl_ast_lock;
+               break;
+       case LDLM_WORK_CP_AST:
+               arg->type = LDLM_CP_CALLBACK;
+               work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_cp_ast_lock;
+               break;
+       case LDLM_WORK_REVOKE_AST:
+               arg->type = LDLM_BL_CALLBACK;
+               work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_revoke_ast_lock;
+               break;
+       case LDLM_WORK_GL_AST:
+               arg->type = LDLM_GL_CALLBACK;
+               work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_gl_ast_lock;
+               break;
+       default:
+               LBUG();
        }
 
        /* We create a ptlrpc request set with flow control extension.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
index 190e370..ad9c71a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -1428,14 +1428,14 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t 
ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
        /* don't check added & count since we want to process all locks
         * from unused list */
        switch (lock->l_resource->lr_type) {
-               case LDLM_EXTENT:
-               case LDLM_IBITS:
-                       if (cb && cb(lock))
-                               break;
-               default:
-                       result = LDLM_POLICY_SKIP_LOCK;
-                       lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_SKIPPED;
+       case LDLM_EXTENT:
+       case LDLM_IBITS:
+               if (cb && cb(lock))
                        break;
+       default:
+               result = LDLM_POLICY_SKIP_LOCK;
+               lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_SKIPPED;
+               break;
        }
 
        unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to