On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:35:23AM +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:45:23PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:26:14PM +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> > > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warnings:
> > >
> > > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > > + int cores_in_use = core_state.baseline_cores -
> > > atomic_read(&core_state.available_cores);
> > >
> > > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > > + skb->data = skb->head + work->packet_ptr.s.addr -
> > > cvmx_ptr_to_phys(skb->head);
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <l...@debethencourt.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c | 6 ++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> > > b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> > > index 44e372f..bd83f55 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> > > @@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct
> > > *napi, int budget)
> > > */
> > > union cvmx_pow_wq_int_cntx counts;
> > > int backlog;
> > > - int cores_in_use = core_state.baseline_cores -
> > > atomic_read(&core_state.available_cores);
> > > + int cores_in_use = core_state.baseline_cores -
> > > + atomic_read(&core_state.available_cores);
> > > counts.u64 =
> > > cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_POW_WQ_INT_CNTX(pow_receive_group));
> > > backlog = counts.s.iq_cnt + counts.s.ds_cnt;
> > > if (backlog > budget * cores_in_use && napi != NULL)
> > > @@ -324,7 +325,8 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct
> > > *napi, int budget)
> > > * buffer.
> > > */
> > > if (likely(skb_in_hw)) {
> > > - skb->data = skb->head + work->packet_ptr.s.addr -
> > > cvmx_ptr_to_phys(skb->head);
> > > + skb->data = skb->head + work->packet_ptr.s.addr -
> > > + cvmx_ptr_to_phys(skb->head);
> > > prefetch(skb->data);
> > > skb->len = work->len;
> > > skb_set_tail_pointer(skb, skb->len);
> > > --
> > > 2.1.3
> >
> > No longer applies to my tree :(
>
> I'm confused.
>
> I just tried applying it to what I think is your tree is and it worked.
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/log/?h=staging-next
>
> Do I have this wrong?
I'm applying patches first to staging-testing to get some 0-day buildbot
testing before merging them to staging-next these days, as I've been
burned with common problems too many times. I took some other octeon
patches that were sent before yours were that caused the conflict. If
you look at staging-testing right now you can see that.
Hope this helps,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
