This was supposed to be a v3 patch. Resent.
On 01/14/2015 04:03 AM, Emrys Bayliss wrote:
> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error:
> rxtx.c:558: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
>
> Signed-off-by: Emrys Bayliss <em...@paradise.net.nz>
> ---
> The else statement was replaced with a block to avoid the following
> compiler error:
> "warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code"
> due to this declaration:
> struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g; (line 559)
>
> Is there a better way such as using head (a union) directly instead?
>
> The last patch I sent removed the return 0. Since this isn't related to
> the error in the title I left it for a separate patch.
>
> drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> index ea5140a..831a051 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context
> *tx_context,
> memcpy(buf->data.ra, priv->current_net_addr, ETH_ALEN);
>
> return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g_fb(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
> - } else {
> + }
> +
> + {
> struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g;
> /* Get SignalField,ServiceField,Length */
> vnt_get_phy_field(priv, cts_frame_len,
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
