On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:22:16PM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 06:13:21PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > we were getting lots of warnings about _tempresult set but not used. > > _tempresult was used in the macro ISSUE_IO_VMCALL_POSTCODE_SEVERITY > > which was again using another macro ISSUE_IO_EXTENDED_VMCALL. > > but the vallue assigned to it was never used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <su...@vectorindia.org> > > Your From: address, and this address don't match, so I can't take this > :(
all my patches have been like this way, and you have taken them before :) the reason its like this way - (already discussed with Dan Carpenter, reference https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/473) we have strict DMARC check for the corporate mail server. DMARC = domain based message authentication. So the mail i sent reached all the list subscriber from a different server than our designated server, and as a result it is marked as spam in many places and I have already received a few complaints regarding that. so at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/535 Dan said its ok for him, but depends on you if you want to accept. And since you have accepted all my patches before so i thought it is ok with you. if you want I can add an extra From: line, but Dan has already given his commments for that at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/135 quoting him : "If everyone starts using From headers like this then it becomes a pain to deal with." please let me know how you want me to send the patches if different email address is a problem. I thought different name is a problem, but different email address??? > > Fix that up please and resend. > > Also, what tool generated those warnings? just make W=1 will give these warnings. regards sudip > > thanks, > > greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
