On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 16:31 -0800, Tolga Ceylan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Tolga Ceylan <tolga.cey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> >> Might as well remove the unnecessary cast too:
> >>                 memcpy(skb->cb, &dev, sizeof(dev));
> >> but it might be better to avoid the memcpy and use an assign
> >>         *(struct net_device *)skb->cb = dev;
[]
> Should I sent a new set of patches (including memcpy change)?
> Or reply to the series with a single memcpy change patch?

Let Larry Finger decide if he wants the
patches at all first.


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to