On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 07:30:07AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:07:25PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >  
> > -   if (parport_register_driver(&panel_driver)) {
> > -           pr_err("could not register with parport. Aborting.\n");
> > -           return -EIO;
> > -   }
> > -
> >     if (pprt)
> >             pr_info("driver version " PANEL_VERSION
> >                     " registered on parport%d (io=0x%lx).\n", parport,
> > @@ -2375,7 +2370,7 @@ static int __init panel_init_module(void)
> >     /* tells various subsystems about the fact that initialization
> >        is finished */
> >     init_in_progress = 0;
> > -   return 0;
> > +   return parport_register_driver(&panel_driver);
> 
> Here I'd rather keep the error message, as it's quite annoying when a
> driver does not load and you don't know why, especially with something
> like parport where there are many possible causes. Something like this
> would be better in my opinion :
> 
> -     return 0;
> +     err = parport_register_driver(&panel_driver);
> +     if (err)
> +             pr_err("could not register with parport. Aborting.\n");
> +     return err;
> 
> Well, I just found that currently parport_register_driver() always
> succeeds, but I still think it's better to verbosely handle errors.

ok, i will send a v2, but is the error message really required? considering the 
fact that parport_register_driver() always succeeds ..

regards
sudip

> 
> Thanks,
> Willy
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to