On 20/05/15 09:22, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:24:18AM +0200, Amaury Denoyelle wrote:
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:57:49PM +0200, Amaury Denoyelle wrote:
<snip>
@@ -1381,7 +1382,9 @@ static int set_ai_fifo_segment_length(struct
comedi_device *dev,
return devpriv->ai_fifo_segment_length;
}
-/* adjusts the size of hardware fifo (which determines block size for dma
xfers) */
+/*
+ * adjusts the size of hardware fifo (which determines block size for dma
xfers)
+ */
I did not understand this one. You are not breaking the comment into
two lines, then why multiline style?
const struct pcidas64_board *thisboard = dev->board_ptr;
@@ -1588,7 +1591,9 @@ static inline void warn_external_queue(struct
comedi_device *dev)
"Use internal AI channel queue (channels must be consecutive and use
same range/aref)\n");
}
-/* Their i2c requires a huge delay on setting clock or data high for some
reason */
+/*
+ * their i2c requires a huge delay on setting clock or data high for some
reason
+ */
same here.
The single-line version of these comments are over 80 characters (just
because of the "*/" characters), so I had to split them over several
lines.
yes, i noticed. its almost 84 char. but after applying your patch also
it comes to 81.
Really? I only see 80 characters.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbo...@mev.co.uk> )=-
-=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=-
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
