> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com] > Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 3:43 AM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; oher...@suse.com; > jbottom...@parallels.com; h...@infradead.org; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; > a...@canonical.com; vkuzn...@redhat.com; jasow...@redhat.com; Keith > Mange > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] hv:scsi:Untangle the storage protocol negotiation > from the vmbus protocol negotiation. > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 01:29:16PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > - if (vstor_packet->operation != VSTOR_OPERATION_COMPLETE_IO > || > > - vstor_packet->status != 0) > > + if (vstor_packet->status != 0) { > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > goto cleanup; > > + } > > There is not actually any cleanup, goto cleanup is just a do-nothing > goto. > > In the original code, we returned success here. That always looked like > a "forgot to set the error code" bug to me, but do-nothing labels always > introduce ambiguous looking "forgot to set the error code" bugs so I can > never be positive. > > Could you take a look at the other "goto cleanup;" places in this > function and maybe add a comment, change it to something more clear like > "return 0;" or fix the error code?
Thanks Dan; will do. K. Y > > regards, > dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
