On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 07:26:25AM +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.) wrote: > @@ -122,7 +121,7 @@ void setChipClock(unsigned int frequency) > * Sometime, the chip cannot set up the exact clock required by > User. > * Return value from calcPllValue() gives the actual possible > clock. > */ > - ulActualMxClk = calcPllValue(frequency, &pll); > + calcPllValue(frequency, &pll);
Should we get rid of calcPllValue() as well? I guess I would prefer to leave the warnings until someone has the answer to this. Warnings are good because they show where the bugs are. It's not always the right thing to silence them. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
