On 07/10/15 23:43, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Fix checkpatch.pl issue:

CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see
        Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt

Replace the udelay() with usleep_range() with a reasonable upper limit.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hswee...@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Ian Abbott <abbo...@mev.co.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
  drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/fl512.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/fl512.c 
b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/fl512.c
index 55cae61..0f278ff 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/fl512.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/fl512.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int fl512_ai_insn_read(struct comedi_device *dev,
                outb(0, dev->iobase + FL512_AI_START_CONV_REG);

                /* XXX should test "done" flag instead of delay */
-               udelay(30);
+               usleep_range(30, 100);

                val = inb(dev->iobase + FL512_AI_LSB_REG);
                val |= (inb(dev->iobase + FL512_AI_MSB_REG) << 8);


Reviewed-by: Ian Abbott <abbo...@mev.co.uk>

--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd.    E-mail: <abbo...@mev.co.uk> )=-
-=(                          Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/  )=-
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to