On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:03:36PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:43:05AM -0500, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
From: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
This goto done is followed by an if (ret) break in the outer switch clause. It
is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessan...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
Also these sign offs don't really make sense. Signed-off-by is
basically like signing a legal document saying the code in this patch
was not stolen from SCO UnixWare. You only need to sign if you have
handled the patch.
Did Dennis write this patch or did he Ack it or Review it somehow?
regards,
dan carpenter
We both participated in creating the patch(s) in this series. I think the
dual signed-off-by is appropriate here.
-Denny
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
