Hi Simon,

Am Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015, 08:14:06 schrieb Simon Guinot:
> This patch fixes a couple of checkpatch warnings about block comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Guinot <simon.gui...@sequanux.org>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c       |  6 ++++--
>  drivers/staging/nvec/nvec_power.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

there was a similar patch from Sakshi Bansal [1] (cc'd) a while ago which also 
fixed a few other stuff. But it had a small bug inside so it wasn't applied. 
Up to now, Sakshi didn't sent a corrected version yet, but I want to give him 
some more time - *ping Sakshi ping* !
 
If there is no reply, I will send a corrected version of his patch with proper 
credits.

Thanks!

Marc

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/14/516


> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> index 802c9597d421..cb0927ddd78f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> @@ -508,8 +508,10 @@ static void nvec_rx_completed(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
> 
>       spin_lock(&nvec->rx_lock);
> 
> -     /* add the received data to the work list
> -        and move the ring buffer pointer to the next entry */
> +     /*
> +      * Add the received data to the work list and move the ring buffer
> +      * pointer to the next entry.
> +      */
>       list_add_tail(&nvec->rx->node, &nvec->rx_data);
> 
>       spin_unlock(&nvec->rx_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec_power.c
> b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec_power.c index 04a7402ae2df..b4a0545e8806 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec_power.c
> @@ -207,8 +207,10 @@ static int nvec_power_bat_notifier(struct
> notifier_block *nb, case TYPE:
>               memcpy(power->bat_type, &res->plc, res->length - 2);
>               power->bat_type[res->length - 2] = '\0';
> -             /* this differs a little from the spec
> -                fill in more if you find some */
> +             /*
> +              * This differs a little from the spec fill in more if you find
> +              * some.
> +              */
>               if (!strncmp(power->bat_type, "Li", 30))
>                       power->bat_type_enum = POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_LION;
>               else
> @@ -356,12 +358,14 @@ static void nvec_power_poll(struct work_struct *work)
>       if (counter >= ARRAY_SIZE(bat_iter))
>               counter = 0;
> 
> -/* AC status via sys req */
> +     /* AC status via sys req */
>       nvec_write_async(power->nvec, buf, 2);
>       msleep(100);
> 
> -/* select a battery request function via round robin
> -   doing it all at once seems to overload the power supply */
> +     /*
> +      * Select a battery request function via round robin doing it all at
> +      * once seems to overload the power supply.
> +      */
>       buf[0] = NVEC_BAT;
>       buf[1] = bat_iter[counter++];
>       nvec_write_async(power->nvec, buf, 2);

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to