On 03/22/2016 04:08 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
Hi Laura,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> wrote:

In the past what drivers have done is a foo_ion_client_create which has the
reference
to the ion_device created from ion_device_create. Drivers then call the
foo_ion_client_create function.

Oh, so you mean you add a function to create a client to the platform
device implementing
the heap and the export this function?

heap implements:

foo_create_client();

driver calls:

foo_create_client() ?


Yes, exactly

Can you elaborate more on your sharing and allocation flow? This might
suggest
another idea.

Well I'll have a bunch of DMA streams to / from an FPGA that contains
DMA engines & accelerators. To that end
my userland software would allocate say 64 buffers, hand them over to
driver A to queue/deque them.

In future I might want to share these buffers between streams and with
other peripherals on the same bus,
which is why I looked at ION.


If allocation is coming from userspace and drivers are only importing
you should be using the dma_buf APIs instead of Ion APIs directly.
Ion is a dma_buf exporter and dma_buf APIs are the preferred API.

Thanks,

Moritz


Thanks,
Laura
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to