Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a
lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this
message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the
remnant to Seagate. Consequently, I don't really follow Lustre any
more. Sorry.
On 04/27/16 15:20, James Simmons wrote:
From: Bruce Korb <bruce.k...@gmail.com>
Convert most of the ldlm lock's l_flags references from direct
bit twiddling to using bit specific macros. A few multi-bit
operations are left as an exercise for the reader.
The changes are mostly in ldlm, but also in llite, osc and quota.
Also add a multi-bit (mask) test.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Korb <bruce.k...@gmail.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2906
Reviewed-by: Keith Mannthey <keith.mannt...@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7963
Reviewed-by: Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucha...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dil...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimm...@infradead.org>
---
.../lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h | 3 +
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
